Disney & The Marvel Buyout – What Can We Expect?

iron-manMy initial reaction to this little piece of news was quite simply… Why? Disney are pretty solid right now, do they need to spend four billion American dollars on Marvel?

Then after thinking about it this is actually one of the smartest things Disney has ever done. It’s right up there with the $7.5 billion Pixar acquisition a few years back. With the buyout comes 5,000 Marvel characters that Disney can exploit and integrate in thousands of ways.

Word on the grapevine is that John Lasseter, the mastermind behind Pixar has met with Marvel himself to discuss future productions – I can’t help but be excited at the prospect of a Pixar/Marvel collaboration!

To be able to include Marvel characters within the Disney theme parks will be a huge bonus not to mention rides based on Iron Man, Spider-Man or Fantastic Four.

Disney stores all over the world would be able to generate more money by selling Marvel products and with the computer game industry booming from games based on superheroes and comic books it can’t fail. How about Mickey Mouse meets Iron Man?

The ever-popular Kingdom Hearts games for Sony have been a huge success. The games are essentially Disney meets Final Fantasy and a similar title including the major Disney characters and Marvel characters would make for very interesting gaming indeed.

spidermanThe Marvel deal also seems tailor made to work hand in hand with the new Disney channel ‘Disney XD’. The channel is aimed at boys so a brand new Spider-Man cartoon animated with the usual Disney flare can only be a good thing! It’s a smart move and even though it may take some time to generate profit, in the long run I believe it will prove to be very fruitful indeed.

However all this talk doesn’t answer one very important question.

Why would a well-respected comic book giant such as Marvel feel the need to sell up? Apart from the fact that pairing with Disney will enable them to reach an entirely new audience the simple fact could be down to money problems.

As with most deals of this nature it always seems to come down to money or lack of money as it were.
Recently Marvel have experienced losses, which it has blamed on lower licence revenue. It stated that less films associated with Marvel characters contributed to shares dropping drastically.

I’m not sure how true this statement is because with Iron Man 2 expected to rake in the cash when it’s released next May this would have surely generated huge profits!

Marvel has had some very public issues regarding contract negotiations with the Iron Man sequel. Don Cheadle has famously replaced Terrence Howard as Col. James ‘Rhodey’ Rhodes and it’s commonly known that Howard’s contract broke down after financial considerations; I guess Don Cheadle is prepared to work for less!

iron-man-2-cheadle-favreau-downeyEven director Jon Favreau almost didn’t make the team as his contract took ages to finalise, and it was only after a very public outcry from film and fan sites alike that Favreau finally signed on the dotted line! Turns out that the producers were not originally prepared to pay him more for the sequel than they did for the original.

All these things essentially confirm that Marvel have had more than their fair share of cash flow problems recently and because of this we can only conclude that maybe they needed this deal with Disney more than Disney actually needed it themselves!

Make Current

Related Stories

About Alex Wagner

Alex lives in London and is a huge film geek. He studied courses at the NYFA ranging from Screenwriting, Editing and Film-Making. Alex has sold scripts to fellow students and worked on many small productions across the capital. Alex has great interest in Japanese cinema even going so far as calling Akira Kurosawa the greatest director that has ever or will ever live. He loves writing, watching films, travelling and football. Being an east Londoner it's West Ham all the way! With an extensive DVD collection and a supreme love for cinema Alex is incredibly happy to be part of the FILMSHAFT.COM team.
  • Jeremy
    There is more to Disney than Hannah and Jonas brothers, even though you know who they are.....
    As for live action you have Pirates of the Caribean. Digital animation you have Toy Story, Incredibles, Cars, etc.

    In regular animation there are countless movies and shows that we have all been raised on and some of us still watch into adult hood.

    Disney has the revenue and the ability to make Marvel movies the way us fans want them. This could be realy good or realy bad for us. As long as they don't go the way of FOX and screw us all with some more Barrakapool we should be okay.
  • Debra
    I would say that comment is ever so slightly melodramatic....!

    I definitely do not agree that just because it is owned by disney it will equal terrible films. There have been bad Marvel movies without Disneys help!

    Also- i have no interest in the jonas brothers or hannah montana but they are programmes aimed at a different group of people. And they are huge successes. If anything it proves that Disney can create very, very popular films, tv programmes and franchises aimed at particular markets, and who is to say that it might not do well with the Marvel characters too?
  • Alex
    Oh and I can't stand Hannah Montana or The Jonas Brothers but if they made me millions of dollars I would probably fucking love them for it!
  • Alex
    LOL...
    Well whatever they come up with it can't be any worse than Daredevil.
    I would rather have a Pixar/Marvel film than a Ben Affleck/Marvel film any day!
  • Name
    okey, well, since everyone seems to think its all business and no integrity...

    this is a horrible horrible horrible idea.

    All we're gonna see now is crap marvel movies JUST as they were starting to do it properly...

    disney should crawl into a hole and die quite frankly...

    They're the people who have brought hannah montana, jonas brothers and that "band" crap (i honestly dont even know what it was called)

    regardless, disney should have stopped having anything to do with films after lion king.

    If i see another useless, bad, poorly rendered "3-d GIMMICK of a CGI/pixar movie I think i might just massacre my family before shooting myself in the face,
  • Craig Sharp
    I suspect this could possibly have huge implications in the future of Marvel Entertainment. People are already predicting watered down versions of the much loved Marvel universe, but I dissagree - this could open up a whole new revenue stream!

    It's true that over the past year there have been huge questions over Marvel's liquid assets - I've asked a fair few of those myself - hopefully this deal will cement their financial security for some fantastic new films!
blog comments powered by Disqus